The Kingsman National Institute (KNI) today announces the launch of a major new, cross-faculty research centre established to confront one of the most powerful and least understood forces in the global economy: the autonomous, high-frequency trading algorithms that now dominate our financial markets.
This new unit, the Centre for Algorithmic Market Structures (CAMS), is not a traditional finance or computer science programme. It is a mandatory, deeply integrated collaboration that brings KNI’s economists, data scientists, and legal philosophers into a single, shared laboratory.
The initiative is a direct response to a profound, and largely unaddressed, systemic risk. The majority of today’s financial transactions are no longer executed by human beings. They are executed by non-human AI “agents” operating in “black boxes” at speeds incomprehensible to the human mind. This has led to critical vulnerabilities, such as “flash crashes,” and has created a new, abstract landscape where it is unclear how—or even if—our existing legal and ethical frameworks apply.
This is a quintessential “Athenian Synthesis” challenge. It cannot be solved by economists who do not understand the code, by engineers who do not understand the law, or by lawyers who do not understand the algorithms.
The CAMS initiative is therefore co-directed by a “triumvirate” of KNI faculty, representing the three pillars of the problem:
- The Economics & AI (KFEP/AIL): This pillar is co-led by Professor Jan Vandermeer (Kolonaki Forum for Economic Policy) and Dr. Matic Novak (Aegean Informatics Laboratory). Their team is tasked with the primary engineering: building a high-fidelity “Digital Twin” of the European stock market. This complex simulation will serve as the “Agora” or “Colosseum” where AI agents can be deployed, tested, and observed in a hyper-realistic, high-speed environment.
- The Law & Governance (PPL): This pillar is led by Professor Zofia Kaczmarek (Professor of Jurisprudence). Her team is tasked with the foundational legal questions. What does “collusion” mean when two competing AI agents, with no human intervention, “learn” over millions of iterations that the most profitable strategy is to raise prices in tandem? Who is legally culpable for a “flash crash” caused by the emergent, unpredictable behavior of a supposedly “safe” algorithm?
- The Ethics & Oversight (CDEG): This pillar, led by Professor Elias Kouris (Centre for Digital Ethics & Governance), serves as the project’s embedded conscience, forcing the other two teams into a necessary, and at times “imperfect,” dialogue.
The central friction of this new lab is already its most productive feature. The KFEP/AIL team’s primary objective is to build efficient agents—AIs that can “win” in the simulation, maximizing profit and market stability.
However, the PPL/CDEG teams have already challenged this definition of success.
“Professor Vandermeer’s team is justifiably proud of an AI agent they designed that learned, on its own, to create a perfectly stable, non-volatile market,” Professor Kaczmarek noted at the launch seminar. “But my team’s analysis showed how it achieved this: by creating a perfect, instantaneous, and illegal monopoly. The engineers saw ‘stability.’ The lawyers saw a criminal enterprise. This is precisely the gap we were built to bridge.”
The true mission of CAMS is not, therefore, to build a “better” trading bot for a bank. Its mission is to be the first in the world to successfully design and build an “Ethically-Constrained Agent.”
This is where the KNI model becomes unique. Professor Kouris and Professor Kaczmarek’s teams are not writing a policy paper. They are writing code. They are working with the engineers to program fundamental legal and ethical principles (such as “Thou Shalt Not Collude” and “Thou Shalt Not Amplify Panic”) directly into the AI’s core architecture as non-negotiable constraints.
The lab’s ultimate goal is to prove, within their Digital Twin, that a market populated by these new “Ethically-Constrained Agents” is not only more stable and less prone to systemic collapse, but also just as efficient as the current “Wild West” model.
“We are moving beyond the 20th-century idea of simply regulating the market from the outside,” Professor Vandermeer concluded. “At KNI, we are asking a more fundamental question: Can we, through superior engineering and applied philosophy, build a better, inherently moral market from the inside?”
This initiative will directly inform new modules in our MSc in Econometrics and our BSc in Computational Science, training a new generation of financial leaders who are fluent in the languages of code, finance, and philosophy.

Leave a Reply